US — . Twenty-one Congressional Republicans are seeking to make a backdoor deal with transgender campaigners, supporting a bill that would prohibit discrimination on the “basis of […] gender identity,” even “while providing certain benefits and exemptions to religious providers.” Recent incidents that received national attention have stirred up increased public interest in the potential ramifications of the bill becoming law.

The Fairness For All Act (FFA), which was introduced to the House by Republican Utah Congressman Chris Stewart on February 26, 2021, will amend Section 201 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include gender identity, along with sex and sexual orientation, as a protected class. The bill also seeks to expand the public accommodations to which anti-discrimination laws would apply.

If passed into law, the FFA would prohibit establishments that providing services or accommodations to the public to treat individuals differently on the basis of declared gender identity. Among those bound by the bill would be retailers, places of exercise, recreation or amusement, providers of medical, mental financial or transportation services and any organization receiving federal funding, including educational institutions and religious corporations.

Chris Stewart and 20 other Congressional Republicans who supported bill including gender identity legislation
Chris Stewart (UT) and 20 Congressional peers (row by row:) Fred Upton (MI), Elise Stefanik (NY), John Curtis (UT), Mark Amodei (NV), Brian Fitzpatrick (PA), Adam Kinzinger (IL), Andrew Garbarino (NY), Blake Moore (UT) Burgess Owens (UT), Carlos Gimenez (FL), Chris Jacobs (NY), Claudia Tenney (NY), Jeff Van Drew (NJ), Jenniffer González-Colón (PR), Maria Salazar (FL), Mario Díaz-Balart (FL), Mike Simpson (ID), Nicole Malliotakis (NY), Steve Stivers (OH) and Tom Reed (NY) all supported a bill protecting gender identity. There are 225 Republicans in Congress.

The FFA grants exceptions for religious institutions, which would continue to be permitted to take gender identity into consideration during the hiring process, and would not be subject to the law’s speech regulations:

The bill (1) exempts a church or religious organization from claims of employment discrimination because of sexual orientation or gender identity under specified circumstances; and (2) prohibits sanctions for certain employee speech regarding the employee’s religious, political, or moral beliefs in the workplace.

Priests, pastors, rabbis, imams and ministers would not be required to provide marriage or mental health services under the FFA, except in the event that the individual seeking counsel presents an imminent danger to self or others.

The FFA “preserves the Religious Freedom Restoration Act so it can continue to protect the First Amendment right of all persons to freely exercise their religion,” says Rep Stewart’s press release advertising the bill.

While Republicans who back the FFA have described it as an alternative to the Equality Act that would protect religious liberty while safeguarding women, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender-identifying individuals from discrimination, recent events have sparked a renewed outcry over what the proposed “compromise” could actually mean for the rights of girls and women.

In July 2021, there were massive protests in Los Angeles after a man who exposed his naked body and erect genitals in the women’s section of Wi Spa was defended by staff, transgender campaigners and the mainstream media. As public outrage grew, the media and transgender campaigners began suggesting there had never been a male patron in the women’s section, and the incident was a hoax. It later came to light that the man was convicted sex offender Darren Agee Merager, who identifies as a woman. Mr Merager was ultimately charged with several felony offenses of indecent exposure after four women and a minor girl filed a complaint about the incident.

More recently, a young girl was violently raped in a Virginia school restroom by a male student who identifies as “gender fluid” and was wearing a skirt at the time of the attack. The incident, which took place in May, came to public light in October. Despite sending an email to the school board in May notifying them of the sexual assault allegation, Loudoun County Public Schools Superintendent Scott Ziegler claimed during a meeting in June: “We don’t have any record of assaults occurring in our restrooms,” and “the predator transgender student or person simply does not exist.” When the father of the rape survivor attempted to correct the misinformation, Supt Ziegler had him arrested for disorderly conduct, and threatened other enraged parents with punishment. Students, parents and staff say Supt Ziegler hid the incident so the transgender restroom policy would be pushed through, and have since been staging protests calling for his and the school board’s firing.  The male student has since been found guilty of the restroom attack, and admitted guilt in the sexual molestation of another girl in the classroom of a school he was later transferred to. The media is now calling the male student a “boy” and the mother is now insisting her unnamed son “is not transgender” but experiments with wearing clothing made for both sexes.

In addition, the public is getting a closer look at how gender identity policies may affect female sports, especially following the lift last week by the IOC of a testosterone restriction for male athletes competing in women’s sports at the professional level. Many social media users are calling it “the end of women’s sports,” suggesting the women’s category may as well be done away with altogether.

With the pending deal between Democrats and some Republicans, it is unknown whether girls and women will be left out in the cold.

CALL TO ACTION

To express your views on FFA, contact a Republican Congressional representative who is supporting the legislation.

Email or tweet Chris Stewart (Utah)
Email or tweet Fred Upton (Michigan)
Email or tweet Elise Stefanik (New York)
Email or tweet John Curtis (Utah)
Email or tweet Mark Amodei (Nevada)
Email or tweet Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania)
Email or tweet Adam Kinzinger (Illinois)
Email or tweet Andrew Garbarino (New York)
Email or tweet Blake Moore (Utah)
Email or tweet Burgess Owens (Utah)
Email or tweet Carlos Gimenez (Florida)
Email or tweet Chris Jacobs (New York)
Email or tweet Claudia Tenney (New York)
Email Jeff Van Drew (New Jersey)
Email or tweet Jenniffer González-Colón (Puerto Rico)
Email or tweet Maria Salazar (Florida)
Email or tweet Mario Díaz-Balart (Florida)
Email or tweet Mike Simpson (Idaho)
Email or tweet Nicole Malliotakis (New York)
Steve Stivers (Ohio)
Email or tweet Tom Reed (New York)

 

7 COMMENTS

  1. Any proposed legislation based on those 3 categories would have to be fundamentally flawed. The ideology of “gender identity” is absolutely incompatible with rights that arise from sex and sexual orientation. It is like upholding the rights of vampires to be employed at the blood bank.

    21
    • I love your succinct summary: The ideology of “gender identity” is absolutely incompatible with rights that arise from sex and sexual orientation. This is so obvious to anyone who gives any thought to this. However, that’s why the T glommed onto the LGB. LGB organizations have become the Trojan Horse through which these trans DEMANDS activists have infiltrated every aspect of our culture. I’m lesbian & I can’t stand it when the media & people in politics frame this as “LGBTQ+ Rights”! This is the most ANTI-lesbian movement ever in this country! It’s anti-woman, it’s anti-LGB, and it’s authoritarian!

      11
    • America the Death Cult, which sums it all up. And our top judicial entity is the Death Cult Court. I believe that certain very powerful people are in favor of “culling” the population, whether through covid or making sure urban children have access to weaponry, letting a violent man who ran over a woman out on $1,000 bail, whatever.

      6
      • I take issue with your framing of this as a problem of the Right. Yes, the SCOTUS is a shitshow of pro-Big Business, anti-environment, anti-Labor justices. The access to weapons is primarily a rural vs. urban issue. The idea of “culling” the population is a popular theme among anti-government consipiracy theorists, who claim that it’s the LIBERALS who are seeking to reduce the population, esp. through abortion. I have a good friend who pro-trans & more socially liberal than I am, yet she’s an anti-vaxxer. So it is really not helpful for you to frame this as part of a larger RIGHT-WING “Death Cult”.

        Remember, the thing that is so alarming about these Republicans compromising is that the Dems are ALREADY & COMPLETELY in the ass-kissing tank for trans demands activists. Before she left office, Tulsi Gabbard proposed legislation to protect girls’ & womens’ sports from males participating. Gabbard is loved by people across the political spectrum for her strong principles & refusing to bow to the Democratic Party establishment, but establishment Dems hate her for being independent. I don’t agree with EVERY position she has, but she did something no other Dem would DARE to do. Of course, she’s no longer in office.

        Democracy Now! is a far-Left news show that portrays trans demands as “LGBTQ+ Rights”. I used to LOVE NPR as one of the last places to get unbiased news, but after hearing them doing that shit & their programming becoming “all trans, all the time”, I can’t stand them anymore. I used to never change my radio from NPR. Now I keep my radios tuned to a local music channel, Sunny 95. I don’t think I’ve EVER heard news on that station! I had to do that to preserve my sanity.

        So please, don’t make this out to be the evil, horrible conservatives against us good liberals. It’s the “LIBERALS” who are just as authoritarian as anyone on the Right, who are seeking to deprive people of free speech & behaving in very UNLIBERAL ways. It’s the “progressives” who are supporting very REGRESSIVE ideas about gender stereotypes & LGB rights & women’s rights.

        Remember that for every Hitler, Franco, & Pinochet, there is a Stalin, Mao, & Pol Pot. Authoritarianism is the common evil we must oppose and it is just as strong on the Left as on the Right in this country. In fact, I would argue it is MORE dangerous. We saw how Republicans attacked Trump for his apparent support of the neo-Nazis in Charlottesville. EVERYONE hates Nazis & fascists except for Nazis & fascists. But people think they are on the side of justice when they support trans demands activists & those activists are calling US “Nazis” & “fascists”.

        This is not a battle between Left & Right. It’s a battle between authoritarianism & freedom. It’s not the Right that is getting people fired from their jobs for saying men aren’t women. It’s the Left that attacked JL Rowling. It’s the Left that regurgitates the slogan, “Trans women are women,” because trance idoeology is a RELIGION to them and that’s their mantra & their dogma & they will not tolerate heretics.

        10
  2. this might be helpful — its a spreadsheet with contact info for every member of congress (including social media). We have to be persistent with the 21 repubs looking to compromise. The best thing to do is call the office and make sure you can give them an address in their district to make sure they actually take note your opposition seriously.

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1s04yh7ZVOCImCpi7Krzo6Zof0GY61GRP/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=101648947875626350104&rtpof=true&sd=true

    2

LEAVE A REPLY