Claire G. Coleman
Claire G. Coleman self-identifies as a black lesbian and a writer. (Courtesy: Wikimedia)

Last Updated 15:06:09 UTC Monday, February 15, 2021

AU — . A white-skinned male, Australian writer who self-identifies as a black lesbian has declared on his verified Twitter account that “kill all TERFs has the same energy as kill all Nazis.” Women who acknowledge that there are two biological sexes and that humans cannot change sex are often labeled ‘TERFs’.

Claire G. Coleman tweets that kill all terfs has the same energy as kill all Nazis
Claire G. Coleman tweets “‘kill all terfs’ has the same energy as ‘kill all Nazis’.” (Credit: Twitter screenshot)

Claire G. Coleman’s February 11 tweet came in response to a woman who linked to the TERF is a Slur website. The woman politely explained that the word ‘TERF’ is often accompanied by anti-women vitriol, such as calls for women who critique gender identity ideology to be punched out or murdered.

Claire G. Coleman calls woman writing letters and emails in support of womens rights an "extremist terf."
Claire G. Coleman calls woman writing letters and emails in support of women’s rights an “extremist TERF.” (Courtesy: Twitter screenshot)

A later tweet by Mr Coleman shows him labeling a mother an “extremist TERF” and “nutcase extremist” attempting to “browbeat and spam politicians into submission to remove trans people’s rights.” The abuse was a response to the mother’s revelation that she emails politicians, council members and other government officials to explain how gender identity policies affect women and girls.

Claire G. Coleman asked a woman whose Twitter bio defines women as "adult human female": "Have you considered that you are a woman hater who is willing to pander to misogynistic definitions of 'woman' just to harm trans women?" (Courtesy: Twitter)
Claire G. Coleman asked a woman whose Twitter bio defines women as “adult human female”: “Have you considered that you are a woman hater who is willing to pander to misogynistic definitions of ‘woman’ just to harm trans women?” (Courtesy: Twitter screenshot)

During the same discussion, Mr Coleman asked a woman whose Twitter bio defines women as “adult human female”: “Have you considered that you are a woman hater who is willing to pander to misogynistic definitions of ‘woman’ just to harm trans women?”

Claire G. Coleman insisted during a discussion that "forcing trans women to use men's toilets is doing trans women harm."
Claire G. Coleman insisted during a discussion that “forcing trans women to use men’s toilets is doing trans women harm.”

Mr Coleman insisted that “forcing trans women to use men’s toilets is doing trans women harm.”

There is not a single incident on record anywhere in the world of an individual who identifies as a trans woman being physically or sexually attacked while using public toilet facilities for men.

Mr Coleman told another tweeter that the UK is “TERF island […] an island where a tiny bubble of high profile TERFs make the world think the TERF movement is huge and powerful.”

Many tweeters accused Mr Coleman of demonstrating hatred for women through his tweets, and disrespecting the LGB community by repeatedly referring to himself as a “lesbian.”

Claire G Coleman tweets that he is a black lesbian
Claire G Coleman tweets that he is a black lesbian, and that it means, “Pretty much every time I punch, it’s up.” (Courtesy: Twitter screenshot)
Claire G. Coleman tweets, "I'm Blak, open-minded, I don't hate anybody, I am definitely not transphobic, I am a lesbian, I will be 47 soon."
Claire G. Coleman tweets, “I’m Blak, open-minded, I don’t hate anybody, I am definitely not transphobic, I am a lesbian, I will be 47 soon.” (Courtesy: Twitter screenshot)

Mr Coleman then suggested that, as a “blak lesbian,” he does not have the power to discriminate against most demographics. “That’s the great thing about being a blak lesbian,” he countered critics. “Pretty much every time I punch, it’s up.”

He additionally insisted that he is “open-minded” and does not “hate anybody.”

ACTION

Those who oppose Mr Coleman’s statement equating women who do not believe in gender identity theory with “Nazis” and suggests killing such women is no less bad are directly challenging Ultimo Press, the publisher for Mr Coleman’s books.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

33 COMMENTS

  1. I’m, sorry, Is he seriously calling himself besides lesbian, black? A white male is calling himself a black lesbian? Is this real? If thats true I hope this goes viral then, and I’ll be laughing when they “beat” him verbally for this.

    36

    • Its really hard to work out whether this transwo-man is actually Aboriginal. There are blurbs out there like: “identifies with the South Coast Noongar people. Her family are associated with the area around Ravensthorpe and Hopetoun”. That’s cleverly ambiguous to mean anything and get away with it. This has the potential to make the Indigenous community a laughing stock – but of course they are probably too fearful of waking the PC beast to say anything.

      26

      • Yes, it is obviously hard to know with any certainty.

        Of course, someone who is prepared to lie (or at least be very disingenuous) about two other significant facets of their own identity – being a woman AND a lesbian – is far more likely to be prepared to lie about Indigeneity in my opinion. It’s like Marginalized Minority Bingo. I imagine it makes it nice and easy to issue forth veiled threats of violence to pesky women, don’t you?

        21

      • Yes, I removed the “aboriginal” descriptor that he has also used from the first sentence of the article. There are too many questions, ambiguities and self-contradictions regarding the origin and it cannot be verified. I believe there is ethnic admixture to this primarily European man, but only he knows his exact origins, and has the choice to not be straightforward about this if he wishes. However, I don’t want to participate in perpetuating any of his misrepresentations.

        Note that this man self-identifies as a person who was born female. He is planning a lawsuit against me for calling him an “Aussie male” and a “male writer.” He has declared this “defamation.” Leaving aside the fact that he has chosen to misrepresent his sex, and is ashamed of being ‘transgender’, trans activists say there is no male biology or female biology, but only unclear “spectrums.” Thus, I’m not sure how he would prove in a court of law that my statement that he is male is inaccurate if there is no way of scientifically determining who is male and who is female. Perhaps I simply have a different definition of male than his. Shrugs.

        32

        • Yeah, I doubt if even an Australian court would consider the fact that someone dared to accurately state his biological sex defamation, somehow.

          Seems rather fond of threatening women who call him out in any capacity whatsoever of legal action, doesn’t he? Ironic that they all seem to be either indigenous or black themselves.

          15

          • Men I write about sometimes threaten to sue me. The day after Mr Coleman threatened a lawsuit, Mr Alanna-Nicole Partin, who is ‘trans’ and charged with raping and sodomizing female children, apparently commented here a threat to sue me. Mr Partin said I misrepresented his motives for giving the court conflicting information about his name (the source I used for his legal arguments were court records). A ‘trans’ NY guy, Deanna LeTray – who broke out a window at the home where his daughter and wife lived to harm daughter’s live-in partner – threatened a year ago to hogtie, beat me and throw me in a sewer, but also sue me because he disagreed with facts I got from police statements. Brendan Blum, a 20ish NJ crossdresser who allegedly sent bigoted and sexually harassing messages to female peers, threatened a year ago to sue. He mainly disliked the photos of himself in a maid’s costume and lingerie (though there was a time he wanted people to see them…weird?)

            The men have the legal liberty to sue, and I respect their freedom to do so. I usually ignore to respectfully give them space to decide how they’d like to proceed. Such a merry band of heroes. They can file a class-action lawsuit and get the public attention they deserve.

            30

  2. Hi, I think you’re absolutely brilliant but (I didn’t save it- why didn’t I save it?!) I think I actually saw one actual incident of a transwoman having been attacked in a toilet- I don’t remember the details, I’m so annoyed with myself but it looked genuine, it was a newspaper report I think- I don’t even remember the country (I’m very happy -keen even! For you to delete my comment after you’ve read it, I just don’t want you to be off guard and get piled on when this single incident gets more well known)

    1

    • When these men who self-identify as trans women were attacked in the toilets, it was not in the men’s toilets. Sometimes women or men have taken exception to such individuals using female toilets, which has resulted in several physical altercations. A year or two ago, a transgender-identifying individual was beaten up after another man caught him trying to enter the women’s toilets, which may be the incident you’re thinking of.

      28

    • The only one I found was a female self-identified as trans, who used the female bathroom and got beaten up by men who thought she was a man.

      1

  3. Oh yeah. Here come the straight while male trans-racials.

    Onto the trans-age next and pedophilia here we come! *facepalm*

    I still think that’s the endgame.

    25

  6. Oh my goodness, HE is NOT BLACK🙄 Even if he was aboriginal, they are not considered Black people (having darker skin does not automatically make you Black). Can we stop this madness already, I’m TIRED of it🙄

    17

    • According to info floating around he has one great-grandmother who was an authentically Australian Aboriginal. However to be fair ethnic lineage isn’t actually the only factor with this, as community acceptance of the particular tribe is the dominant factor – that is the actual law in Aus re legal entitlements. (Interesting how Indigenous status requires acceptance of its legitimacy from the group but rights to be considered legally female were not granted such requirement?)
      Fortunately looks like his claims are being challenged by some people from the community. This of course will put all those people who pandered to him and gave him prizes meant for women into a hard position. We’ve had this before in Aus publishing although not this outrageous – the Helen Demidenko affair. And that was a white woman pretending to be a white woman, just from another ethnicity. Dani: I think this is the kind of blatant scandal that is necessary to get the slow moving public & media to blow the lid. Keep the madness coming and keep showing it to everyone.

      15

    • In Australia, Aboriginal people are historically considered Black, except some activists are trying to change the spelling to “Blak”.

      1

  7. Dani: Agreed that the man is not black. He may be a white man with a trace of Aboriginal or other admixture.

    I think the idea of the “one-drop rule” – of “black blood” as pollutant that contaminates and makes a person black – is bigotry. It has the same origins and similar goals as a rule that defined a black American person as ⅗ of a human. I think you can’t accept one without the other.

    This is Sasha Sarago, an Aboriginal Australian woman, phenotypically indistinguishable from a person of African heritage or descent.

    https://www.sbs.com.au/nitv/article/2019/04/18/meet-sasha-sarago-woman-behind-australias-first-indigenous-lifestyle-magazinest-indigenous-lifestyle-magazine

    https://youtu.be/zDMxAlTitgc

    When populations migrated from Africa, cradle of humanity, those who went in and around Australia – such as Melanesia and other Pacific islands – didn’t change much phenotypically over the centuries as groups who went to other regions did. The new environment must not have demanded many physical changes. “Black” is often used where most of a person’s ancestors evolved in Africa – but the word has been in use for centuries as a classification for indigenous Australians’ phenotype, too. It wasn’t stolen. They don’t seem to have less claim on the word than the African-descended. I respect their centuries-long classification as they originally used it. Not where they later adapted the “one-drop rule” from the US.

    18

      • @Emerald Eye

        I don’t think it comes from viewing Aboriginal heritage as a pollutant, the opposite in fact.

        Strongly disagree. That’s exactly what it means when people insist that one drop of ‘black blood’ makes a person black, no matter how it’s dressed up or portrayed as cultural pride. In any cultures who do this, the ones who are richest and put on the highest pedestal by the people of the culture who claim them are the ones who have the most non-black admixture. That’s an inferiority complex dressed up as ethnic pride. It’s dressed up as ethnic pride because they live vicariously through their most admixed counterparts while not addressing the fact that their own situation isn’t really bettering. I’m a black woman, by the way, and of course.

        ETA: I later realized this Emerald Eye is a transactivist or transsexualist troll.

        10

  8. This guy fusing gender dysphoria with race dysphoria is the latest incarnation of techno-humanity’s growing bio-phobia, which is intensifying by the hour, and will ultimately morph into species-dysphoria in its service to the grand delusion of transcending biology altogether. I for one, am putting in my pre-order to be surgically corrected into my real self as a border collie who’s essence will attain immortality by being uploaded onto a computer chip.
    In a bio-phobic world, sanity is the first casualty.

    19

    • ‘species-dysphoria’
      The age of furries incoming? I dread it. Remember when furries were mocked basically everywhere on the internet and IRL? That may be ‘hate speech’ very soon!

      11

    • I’ve seen a woman identifying as a bird on YouTube, she even mentioned what species, and the one for her mate. We can’t use this as a joke anymore to illustrate how absurd it is.

      4

      • I’ve seen a woman identifying as a bird on YouTube, she even mentioned what species, and the one for her mate. We can’t use this as a joke anymore to illustrate how absurd it is.

        Oh… I think I know the young woman to whom you are referring – and I’m fairly sure that she actually has/had a (non-ironic) following on TikTok! Perhaps I’m mistaken and she now has a YouTube presence of her own as well, but a few Youtubers that I know highlighted her case in videos shining a light on the excesses of trans extremists and their ilk on TikTok.

        In my opinion it’s still absurd, but is it really that much more absurd than “identifying” as anything else you categorically are not – such as the opposite biological sex, neither sex whatsoever, or a racial group to which one does not belong? All of these things are routinely “identified into” by members of the “trans” community to varying degrees of widespread acceptance (social justice warrior types disapprove of those who merely “identify” as a race they are not but there are several prominent male trans activists who claim to be women of a different race working in academia with no apparent issue).

        It would appear that the phrase “Go big or go home” applies to the lies told by many of these people (particularly if they are male) thanks in large part to the advent of post-modernism and the unmitigated rise of misogyny in our society.

  9. This is what happens when you let trannies run amok. First they were claiming to be women and now they’re claiming to be “trans racial.” And whenever they make these asinine claims, we have to take them at their word or put up with rape and death threats.

    On a side note, all of them look nasty. They’re all hairy, out of shape men in dresses. Invest in a fucking hairbrush and a razor, you nasty fuck.

    22

  11. The people who say they are feminists and say they support women rights, but also support transgender women (men) being allowed in women spaces like “women sports” are not real feminists in my opinion and I don’t think they actually support women rights.

    Here are these three women rights centered subreddits on Reddit:
    https://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/
    https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/
    https://www.reddit.com/r/WitchesVsPatriarchy/

    However, many people on these subreddits often talk about how transgender women (men) should be allowed in women spaces and how they should be allowed in women sports, and most people on these subreddits seem to agree with that. On those subreddits, if you say anything about being against transgender women being allowed in biological women spaces like women sports, you will most likely be labeled a transphobe and get banned from those subreddits.

    Any “real” feminist would actually be against stuff like (including allowing transgender women in women sports). Transgender women clearly do have an unfair advantage against biological women due to them having male hormones. Males are usually biologically stronger than females are, and that’s a well known fact. The reason why men and women sports were separated from each other in the first place was due to biological reasons and not at all due to social reasons. Many feminists throughout history have been fighting for women sports to be taken seriously, and when they finally do get taken seriously, they end up becoming a joke again because of transgender women being allowed in them.

    7

  12. Because he is a man, he’s allowed to. There is another white man that claims to be an Indian woman from India…another white man that claims to be trans and an indigenous woman that gives paid lectures on the oppression of Native Americans. Only because these are white men is this allowed.

    13

  13. Why is it that he/she (I’m not sure which one) can state TERF’s are Nazi’s but if I were to say LGBTQIAP+ were Nazi’s I would be arrested.

    8

LEAVE A REPLY