Note: Some images contain strong language that may not be suitable for all audiences.
Transgender advocates have decided that the only form of ‘violence’ that exists is denial of ‘gender identity’.
Acts that social collectives traditionally perceived as violence – such as murder, beatings, mutilation, torture, rape, sexual assault – have been re-imagined by transgender activism to be of little importance, paling especially in comparison to ‘gender identity’ validation.
Many ordinary people were shocked when activist Zoé Samudzi tweeted in 2015 that the worst part of an AP news report about Peter Frederiksen mutilating 21 women’s vulvas and storing the severed clitorises in a freezer was the “inherent cissexism” of the reporter’s assumption that this type of genitalia could only be part of female bodies.
Few realize this thinking is the norm amongst transgender advocates, who routinely attempt to post such disturbing commentary on Women Are Human’s website and Facebook page.
In 2019, transgender-identifying Facebook user Katie Hernandez declared himself “platinum mad fam” over Women Are Human’s article on Jakob (“Dakota”) Nieves, who is imprisoned in the US for repeatedly raping a four-year-old girl and disseminating photos and video of the sick acts. What provoked Hernandez’s ire was not realization that a child will suffer a lifetime of trauma knowing she had been made to perform oral acts on an adult and that this abuse is immortalized online for pedophiles to view forever. Instead, Hernandez was angered that it may hurt the feelings of the young man who raped a child with his penis, and the feelings of those who empathize with him, if this rapist’s personal faith that he is female is not respected.
What could be worse than a serial rapist haunting the streets to violate women and teen girls at random, even dragging one of the strangers into an alleyway to rape her? According to Eve, blogger at Eve’s Transition Story, ‘misgendering’ US serial rapist Vyvenne Ward (né Kenneth Andrew Couch) while discussing the rapes Ward committed is the real wrong. An individual using his penis as a weapon to terrorize women and girls in the streets is so inconsequential to Eve that the rapes did not warrant a single mention in the rambling January 2019 essay. A woman who denies this rapist’s ‘identity’ as female is a “nazi feminist” operating as a “menace” to Eve’s existence. How dare women acknowledge the facts that a person cannot identify out of biological sex, and that men who self-identify as women do not have a statistically lower rate of violent or sexual criminality than other men?
Unlike most gender identity advocates, who forget to throw in an obligatory, half-hearted “this crime is wrong, but…” or “I feel bad for the victim, but…” one-liner in their rants, Kris managed to muster one vague mention of the survivor of a Canadian sexual assailant when commenting on our website early this year. Of course, Kris failed to place responsibility on attacker Sherri Dawn Barrett, referencing only “the awful things that happened to JC” – as if JC had met with an unforeseeable accident, rather than a perpetrator who actively chose to harm her while she provided care services at his home. Kris then immediately launched into accusatory paragraphs about Women Are Human’s use of “male pronouns and male titles (like Mr).” Kris ended the tirade with the hope that, after being charged, Barrett gets “help acceptable for all of her actions.”
Kris did not specify the nature of the “actions.” In Canada, sexual criminality statistics show 87% victims are female, and attacked by 99% male perpetrators. Nor did Kris note that it is highly unlikely a female perpetrator could, with bare hands, so hopelessly dominate another adult, easily lifting the crime target high off the floor as Barrett had with JC. JC had to pretend to like Barrett before he allowed her to leave the home.
Last November, transgender advocate Eric Belozovsky got so upset over our report on a man imprisoned in Sweden for luring his ex-girlfriend, chopping her to death and scattering her body parts, that Belozovsky announced an intention to mute the Twitter thread. What Belozovsky found most “terrible” and lacking in “respect” was not that femicidal maniac Kim Marie, alias Magdala (né Kristoffer) Johansson had chosen to murder and dismember a woman, and is apparently threatening to kill women who tweet opposition to his transfer to women’s prison, but that our article made no pretense that Johansson is a woman.
Similarly, transgender advocate Aerin last month condemned our report on Carmen Guerrero as “disgusting.” Not because Guerrero mercilessly stabbed his girlfriend to death while their 14-year-old daughter was present in the home – but because Women Are Human did not use the femicidal killer’s preferred female ‘pronouns’, and did not assent to mainstream media’s position that this man who had slaughtered a woman should have been housed in women’s prison for his protection.
Guerrero was murdered in a US men’s prison by an anti-gay cellmate who had previously declared to prison authorities “a restriction not to be housed with a fa***t.” Rather than lobbying lawmakers to implement procedures to reduce violence in men’s prisons or establish a dedicated wing in men’s prisons for vulnerable male demographics, Aerin implied that Guerrero was essentially entitled to use female inmates as human shields to keep him safe from other men. It did not matter to Aerin that Guerrero’s presence as a male – a proven violent male at that – would have put him at the top of the pecking order in women’s prison, and placed female inmates at the mercy of any physical or sexual violence or intimidation he should choose to engage in. It did not matter to Aerin that 75% of female inmates are imprisoned for non-violent offenses. Nor did it matter that female inmates frequently come from backgrounds of sexual or family violence, and being forced to shower and share a cell with a man would agitate the trauma and mental illness that often result from such a history and that are believed by researchers to be a “pathway to prison” for women in the first place.
Three days later, Aleks declared our article on Marilyn (né Marcelo) Bernasconi “offensive.” Bernasconi shot his mother and brother to death in Argentina for not sharing his belief that he is a woman. The unremorseful familicidal killer openly describes the “peace” he has felt since the murders, particularly after viewing photos of the graves. He insists he had to annihilate his disbelieving family in order for his supposed true female self to rise from their ashes. Mainstream media sympathizes with the inmate, who is lobbying for release, and a movie celebrating his life has found success. What offended Aleks, however, is that we used “he pronouns” for Bernasconi. Aleks commanded us to “proof check with LGBTQI proficient editors.”
On an article about US university student Pablo Gomez, who self-identifies as ‘non-binary’, a commenter simply wrote: “Gomez does not identify as a man. They go by the pronouns ‘they’.” Apparently, nothing else about our account of Gomez murdering a female stranger before attempting to kill his female friend and fellow student was upsetting enough to remark on.
Another transgender advocate denounced our website as “pathetic and disgusting,” “anti-lgbtq and transphobic,” “hateful,” “demeaning, dehumanizing and using ad hominem attacks,” and said we are “clearly seeking attention” and “should be ashamed.” Why? Because we accurately reported the sex of prominent US transgender activist Dena Stanley, who went to the home of a woman to pepper-spray her two children in the face before nearly hitting her infant with a brick, and months later threatened to burn down a bar unless the female manager changed its “transphobic” dress code.
There was a bizarre moment when the commenter told the article writer, a black woman, that Stanley is a black woman. The woman whose family Stanley terrorized at their home is a black woman. Her children, whom Stanley pepper-sprayed and threw bricks at, are black children. It is typical of transgender advocates to use the world’s heightened racial sensitivity towards black men’s plight as a tool to hammer in adherence to gender identity ideology. While feigning racial sensitivity, the commenter dehumanizes black women by pretending a black woman is a feeling or spirit animal inside of a man or a costume a man wears, rather than a human of a material reality that includes biological sex, phenotype and regional ancestry.
Gender identity ideology not only demands redefinition of the words ‘woman’ and ‘female’, but redefinition of the word ‘violence’ so that individuals who identify as transgender can be the only possible victims.
The hearts of gender identity believers are so frozen over in most cases that they are unmoved by murdered, raped, tortured or mutilated humans, particularly those of the female sex. The lack of concern for the humanity of others that gender identity ideologues display is driven by burning hatred or cold indifference to those outside of themselves – particularly women and girls. They can focus only on the validating personal pleasure they receive when addressed with ‘she/her’ or other ‘preferred pronouns’, and seeing the select few humans they can empathize with referenced in a ‘preferred’ way. They fly into narcissistic rage when this perceived entitlement is denied them.
Even survivors of rape and other assaults are required to pretend in public that their male abuser is female. Maria MacLachlan of the UK discovered this when she struggled to maintain such a pretense about her attacker Tara Wolf throughout his trial for viciously assaulting her. MacLachlan was denied compensation and punished by the judge for ‘misgendering’.
Rape and abuse survivors in shelters, locker rooms and prisons are also expected to ignore their own distress, fear or trauma, and participate in gender identity roleplay fantasies, as refusing men who self-identify as women the ‘gender’ validation they garner from being in the presence of women is the only form of ‘violence’ and trauma that exists. The Canadian refuge Vancouver Rape Relief was tormented with hateful graffiti and the nailing of dead rats to the building’s exterior and defunded through the efforts of such transgender activists as Morgane Oger after its administrators refused to place male staff who self-identify as women into positions requiring direct, one-on-one contact with female rape survivors, or permit men who self-identify as women to be housed amongst them.
Indeed, according to gender identity believers, rapes, beatings, murders and other acts formerly known as extremely violent are not only not noteworthy, but actually justifiable responses to the one form of ‘violence’ transgender advocates recognize – the denial of their perceived right to hear their ‘preferred pronouns’.
Featured image credit: moiranazzari/Pixabay
One must wonder how these activists might feel if a freezer full of male genitalia was discovered. Women’s bodies, indeed women as living entities, are worthy of being used sexually or for breeding and then be discards and nothing more. It is amazing that the very thing these men say they are is also the very thing they threaten and wish to kill.
I have often wondered if there were entities amongst us who look human and are assumed to be human–but are not. Or, perhaps there is such a thing as a soul; if do, these activists do not possess one. They are as amoral as anything I can imagine. They–lack humanity.
While it’s become obvious to me (mainly through anecdote due to the dearth of recent published academic research into transgender issues†) that many who transition have comorbid borderline and/or sociopathic tendencies, this callous disregard for half of humanity is still extraordinary to me. Surely these activist types realize how appallingly this reflects upon them? You feel that they could at least attempt to feign a soupçon of empathy?!
It’s noteworthy how shockingly the few trans individuals who are willing to publicly denounce the criminals and shysters who exploit the ever expanding “trans umbrella” are treated by their own so-called community. Transsexuals who call out disgusting perverts like Yaniv and Joseph/Josephine Smith, pointing out that paedophillic criminals are not considered welcome in the LGBT community at large are ostracized and labelled “truscum”, “boot-licker” or ironically (considering the level of casual and implicit racism among this cohort) being a “quisling” or “Uncle Tom” by other trans people.
You would think that these activists might have just enough insight to concede that this shockingly misogynist and plain antisocial behavior does nothing to further their cause – but apparently they do not. It is a shame that the mainstream media continues to be stymied by a terror of being perceived to be “transphobic”, whatever that might happen to mean today.
†Due primarily to the chilling effect of bullying of institutions by TRAs and their SJW enablers. Anyone who doubts this is the case has merely to look to the examples of Alice Dreger, Lisa Littman and James Caspian.
Miriam, you really hit the nail on the head in a way very few people are ready to consider: that despite fleshly appearances to the contrary, we human beings are not made of the same “soul stuff.” You can perceive it through the lens of spirituality or of aliens/ETs. Both are valid. What we’re witnessing is an invasion of sorts, and yes, it is misogynistic at the core. A hatred of the divine feminine aspect of Spirit/Mother God. It’s been here all along, of course, but it’s ramping up from every which way.
This is not normal human behavior, to be so dismissive of the violent harm done to other human beings (maybe especially women & children) while decrying misuse of pronouns. This is beyond mental illness, it’s a spiritual sickness. And it’s spreading. I could tell you these twisted people are linked to a hivemind that seeks to cause chaos & destruction and most would think I’m insane. But it’s true, and it’s happening.
They’ve infiltrated nearly every institution. They only APPEAR human; their soul is of…something else. Listen to your intuition, “check the vibes.” As they gain power & influence, they may become more dangerous. A key is to not allow ourselves to sink to their level of hatred & willful ignorance of objective reality (which is admittedly stranger than it appears on the surface lol). It helps us to wish them well (ie, no harm) from afar, and hope those toward the center of the trans rights debate come to see the light.
I do not wish them well. I wish them to disappear. Paradox of tolerance. Every tolerant category is erased by the mean agressive one, through history it’s been like that. Europeans were the most uncivilised and oppressed everyone around the world. We can’t tolerate intolerance or we’ll die, and then being tolerant won’t do much good, since it means the ratio of the population will be made of even worse people, until only aggressive people remain.
And, no, killing in self-defense and killing out of hate are not the same. Self-defense is self-love, and love for the oppressed category, rather than enabling oppressors to do more damage.
An excellent article, as always! I’ve often read on the internet such comments as: “It’s none of your business if I’m trans,” or, “It has no effect on you.” It’s as if, to those inside the bubble, no-one else exists.
Demanding we learn new words and speak differently; being coerced into a kind of unpaid prostitution in which we are to massage the egos of fetishists who get off on being referred to as the opposite sex; having simple facts misconstrued as ‘hate speech’; being threatened, insulted, fired, doxed, assaulted; being referred to by dehumanising, body-function language; having health forums invaded; removal of the safety and dignity of single-sex spaces; seeing men’s crimes being recorded as women’s; watching from the side-lines the demise of women’s sports; families being torn apart by arguments with indoctrinated teenagers; teenagers submitting themselves to cosmetic surgery that is unlike any other, not the mere tweaking of body-parts they already have, but far more drastic procedures; children’s natural instincts to know who’s who being drummed out of them; girls being brought up to believe they can never say ‘no’ and must always take second place to boys who call themselves ‘girls’; children in tears of confusion after the nonsense they’ve been told at school; premature sexualisation of children; women being reduced to mere objects or incubators; the plight of ‘trans widows’; the cheap, pornified parodies of ‘femininity’; the impending threat of transhumanism; fraudulent documents; legalised fiction . . .
No, to them, none of this has any effect on us, and we have no right to even comment, because once in the cult, no-one outside is seen as a real person. I am convinced of it.
Yes, these people are experts at twisting the truth. One of them claimed on Twitter that I “justify hate crimes” against transgender individuals in this article. I asked him to point it out. Of course, this man who identifies as “sapphic” did not respond, as he knows very well this article does not once do that. This website does not once do that. It is a way of discouraging people from reading this article, which they know makes them look bad.
Rather, this article contains examples of men who self-identify as women committing hate crimes against girls and women: raping, selling exploitative images of rapes, and murdering us in cold blood for no particular reason. They then gaslight women by stating “this never happens.” When we collect evidence to show that it does happen, they deflect by demanding we lie and gaslight ourselves and others by using fake pronouns that would make it appear women are sexually and violently terrorizing ourselves. They demand news media and crime statistics use fake ‘pronouns’ to conceal facts.
Note that I have plenty of articles about men who self-identify as women raping, murdering or assaulting men and boys, too – yet the articles transgender advocates focus on to correct ‘pronouns’ are the ones with female victims; it is a calculated strategy by these dead-hearts.
Transgender activism is an anti-women hate movement, and this is why I do not waste my time seriously engaging transgender activists in conversation in the hopes of changing them. They know exactly what they are doing. It is very deliberate and they enjoy it. The only thing I care to do is to inform the average person about the effects of this movement. Most people do not believe humans can change sex, but just ignore the issue, because they are unaware of how it has been affecting society, and how it will worsen. The few speaking on gender identity at all are the minority, those who are passionate on either side of the issue. We simply have to motivate more average people to take social, political and economic action by educating them about the problems with this sick, hateful movement.
I just realized that when he said this article justifies transphobic hate crimes, the deranged dead-heart is most likely referring to our refusal to use or encourage use of ‘preferred pronouns’. That is the so-called hate crime.
Why would I even be surprised that ‘pronouns’ would be the one thing he would get from this article, just as that is the one thing his transgender ally peers got? These people are unstable, and filled with the hatred they project onto us.
Yes. Now that the truth can be considered to be an “ad hominem attack”, everyone is in trouble.
Just appalling what TRAs will justify. They clearly hate women, and it’s so disturbing to see women I know defend them and side with them. Misogyny is truly the most prevalent destructive element on the planet. Thank you, thank you for all your work documenting this insanity.
I just received another of these comments. The article is about a transgender-identifying individual who raped a sleeping underage boy, and who now as a prison inmate is lauded by the media for winning the right to undergo ‘gender-affirming’ plastic surgery at taxpayer expense. This story upsets the transactivist because we accurately reported that the child rapist is male, rather than affirming the child rapist’s ‘gender’ faith. What is not upsetting to the transactivist, of course, is the fact that a child got raped.
Geez, some of these people seem just pathologically awful, don’t they? I suppose they consider child rape “character building” or something? [Didn’t Janet Mock say something like “All teenage transgirls should engage in prostitution” aka child rape? Revolting…]
What bothers me is that the trans reich has been mask off for years, especially on twitter, and no one really mainstream is brave enough to call out the violence, misogyny, and homophobia.
Even JK made comments about ‘ye goode trans’ to cover her backside.
Yes – I picked up on this wavelength for a while. Looks to me like public-facing women who are fighting this movement are moderating their discourse to accommodate room for the “good trans”. I wondered for some time if it is my own cynisism that makes me perceive this. Maybe not.
Not that it makes any difference to the ragers – they will be set off by anything other than complete compliance anyway. But it does hold up civility and shows a degree of class by people like JK and Holly Lawford-Smith and others. It is actually quite satisfying for JK to make statements that clearly state what we really know underneath – but which don’t cross any lines established by PC standards – therefore making it impossble to justify a full bore attack on her by those still maintaining the public face. (Those not so constrained have indeed been free to engage in such nastiness).
As to whether JK is keeping on the reservation of PC discourse out of honest conviction or merely self-preservation, I don’t know. It is satisfying to watch those outraged but not given sufficient ammunition to fully retaliate. Good tactic.
Oh no, you’re not wrong. Most of the feminist sites I’ve traversed have some out gassing for ‘goode trans’.
“She knows she’s a man so we use her female pronouns.” Gaaaaag.
So many of these thugs should be jailed.
I wish you had a chat room
I agree, HellaDea.
This occurred again two days ago.
A man in Canada groomed and repeatedly raped his 4-year-old daughter, and was placed in a women’s prison. Transgender-identifying tweeter Gabriel didn’t care about the child, or the man’s newest pool of potential victims, but just wanted everyone to remember the ‘gender identity’ of the child rapist.
Shameful… It’s not like the Canadian lawmakers didn’t know certain men would take full advantage of this crap, is it?
Disgusting.
On an episode of Revolutionary Left Radio (a communist podcast) true believer Zoé Samudzi said in total seriousness: “It is an impossibility for white people to ever not be racist.” So reading her vicious and abhorrent words here sadly didn’t surprise me. The fervour this religious cult inspires is terrifying. The people who complain vociferously about the dehumanising practice of “othering” are those who practice it the most. Nothing reifies the ability to dehumanise others than moral certainty. I struggle constantly about whether or not I’m right in opposing transgenderism. Then I read articles like this and feel ashamed for not attacking it more aggressively.
I did not hear that podcast, so I am not sure know how Zoé Samudzi defined her use of the word “racist” in that context. I am not sure if she was referring to thought, as well as action.
Either way, the statement is counterproductive and ultimately useless as an analysis, like much of modern social justice theory, sadly. If people know they will be condemned and shamed as bigots no matter what intentions they have and actions they take, it will give them no incentive to try, and may ultimately backfire by creating desensitization. There are productive ways to work towards overall betterment of humanity, and social justice culture has not found it. It’s deeply flawed, and a few of these flaws are most toxic and harmful to those they purport to be fighting for. Like, for example, in cases when women and children in these groups are being harmed at disproportionate rates, and the same women and children are silenced by SJWs, who feel it would make the men look bad. Abuse thrives in silence. Modern SJW movements lack nuance and strategy.
But that’s just the way it is. I have been trying to speak to SJWs since my late teens, and even constructive critique never penetrates – only creates anger – so it will never change. But back to topic at hand.
There is a major issue which you mention present in Australia (and hidden away from public view). It is the abuse -sexual or otherwise- of Aboriginal women and children within their own communities. The mainstream policies are blinkered by SJW ideology which tries to contort itself any way possible to lay the blame for any dysfunction that exist of external factors like colonialism & racism. Add to that using excuses of traditional cultural practices for anything that breaches modern standards of propriety.
The converse problem is high incarceration and deaths in custody of Aboriginal men, and hence the authorities do everything possible to avoid putting the latter in prison rather than focusing on protecting their victims. The overwhelming motivation is to protect the good name of the community and avoid putting men in jail rather than protecting the victims.
Some brave women from these communities have tried to stand up for this issue to be bullied into silence. I wish I could link to some articles about it but I just can’t find them. Of course the reflexive response of those guarding the public discourse on this subject is to accuse anyone not toeing th eline of being at best naive, at worst a right wing troll.
But specifically WRT the abuse of children – you may well be correct.
Luckily for women, patriarchy is obviously dead, we have nothing to complain about, now that we have the same rights as men, and of course Not All Men, how reassuring. 😀
I agree that there’s a great deal of abuse which goes on within Indigenous communities in Australia, but my analysis is more that there’s a lot of dishonesty on both sides (as it were) of this complex set of issues.
I respectfully disagree with your assertion that the majority of the mainstream Australian media “puts the good name of the community first”, in addition to “avoiding putting men in jail rather than protecting the victims”. There is just as much of that going on in the population at large here. Female victims of crimes such as rape and domestic violence in this country tend to get a comparatively raw deal whether they’re white, Asian or Indigenous, although if they (the victim) are Indigenous themselves, they are statistically far less likely to ever see anything even remotely resembling justice, IMHO.
I don’t want to get into an argument re the Aus Indigenous community (I suspect you don’t either) – but I feel there is an overarching theme of women’s interest being sacrificed to “take one for the team” that has entrenched itself in the social justice era. (I read Diane as clearly relating to this.)
There are many examples all over the Western world. The Rotheram case in the UK. Immigrant communities forcing their teen girls into arranged marriages – often to their own family members. FGM. Etc Etc. The whole concept of intersectionality looks like a clever manipulation to always find a defensible way of putting women’s interest last. Mainline feminism is not afraid to shout in a loud voice to advocate for victims in the mainstream community, but it seems to walk on eggshells and self censor in those other contexts.
(Re the Aus media – it depends entirely which outlet is covering the issue. The right wingers take every opportunity to dog whistle of course, but it is obvious eg the Guardian is threading a rhetorical needle. An open discussion with no ideological strings attached is not possible in this environment.)
This is actually really relevant to the issue at hand because its a mass-expansion of the practice.The sacrifice of women’s rights to the gender movement dwarfs the prior examples since it is not confined to a small minority but impacts the entire half of the population.
It’s Diana, actually. There’s a different commenter here named Diane.
Yes, I speak from my experience as a woman of a marginalized/oppressed ethnic demographic in the US who has been silenced and seen other women silenced, and sees the negative consequences of this silencing to the collective.
One can look at the statistics to see that black women are most victims of intimate partner homicide, and the only group of women who are murdered nearly as often by intimate partners are indigenous American women. You can hear a pin drop as the bodies drop, with rates higher during COVID lockdown. https://www.facebook.com/blackwomenandgirlsmatter/ Native American women are most rape victims, with black women close behind. With rape cases, black women’s and girls’ are least likely to be prosecuted and least likely to receive convictions when they do, as law enforcement and prosecutors say black women and girls are least likely to cooperate with the investigation and prosecution (research also found that it was due to community pressure to protect the perpetrator). Black girls are by far most victims of human sex trafficking. I believe this is a pattern worldwide that women of the most marginalized or oppressed social groups are statistically most likely to be harmed and least likely to receive justice.
The lesson in this is that men who choose to engage in physical and sexual violence are most likely to target women whom they can harm without punishment. Therefore, silencing women, girls and children in danger in order to center the feelings and reputation of any demographic of men is dangerous. I never support victims being silenced in order to protect perpetrator’s feelings, and I don’t care what group the man belongs to or how marginalized or oppressed he has been. He always understands that his behavior is harming children and women, and it is never ok for him to use them as a punching bag to feel better about being oppressed. I believe men are always responsible for their own reputation, and each one should choose to behave in a moral manner, rather than demand silence of victims.
Megan Stembridge was infuriated on Twitter after reading our latest article. What provoked Stembridge’s rage was not the fact that 39-year-old Alanna Nicole Partin (né Nicholas Jon Partin) raped and sodomized two pre-pubescent girls, but that the ‘preferred pronouns’ of this adult male rapist were not used in the article.
Another dead heart, frozen over, coldly indifferent to the humanity of women and girls.
A female, “ally” dead heart at that. So disappointing that someone would rather “be kind” to and about a serial child rapist who gaslights society than the woman who endeavours to bring the unabridged story concerning the plight of those child victims to light.
Besides which (I have been meaning to say) if these allies truly believed in the alleged identities of these individuals – they’d not be so fixated on the provision of pronouns for them.
Here we have Steven Best, who is so upset about the same child rapist-sodomizer’s pronouns that the “pedophilic rape” was only a footnote in his rant.
I have never encountered a gender identity advocate who did not display sociopathic indifference to girls and women. That is why I don’t believe their motives for this movement is “concern” for men who self-identify as transgender. I don’t see where they are capable of compassion. There’s something else going on.
Brianna and Ashley both came by today and got triggered over the pronouns of different murderers.
A man participated in the murder of his rich uncle, because he wanted to use the money to fund his ‘gender-affirming’ surgery. Brianna was not present while the crime was taking place, but insists that the man did not commit the crime and should not be referred to as a man.
Ashley is upset because a man who murdered a same-sex female couple and their adopted child is accurately referred to as male.
Astonishing, honestly… How does obfuscating the situation by colluding with the gender feelz claims of a homicidal sociopath assist anyone (besides the sadist concerned)?
Why should you have to respect anything about this man – let alone his alleged self-concept?! These people show their lack of humanity every single time.
Another one triggered over a pedo’s ‘preferred pronouns’. Raped a 4-year-old girl, recorded it and distributed the video, but he’s the real victim, and sharing news about him makes trans people look bad.🙄 So men’s feelings and reputation outweigh a little girl’s human right to have not been raped, and to have the details accurately reported.
They’re in the grip of fundamentalist belief – that’s why they can’t help themselves.
It’s still obscene and I cannot help but notice that the pronouns of TIFs are seldom so vehemently enforced.
I suspect this is an attempt to distract men from the damage they’ve done to pretty much everything. While the Earth burns and gasps they can still have FUN with women and children and not think too much about how their depravity has cause mass extinction and the end of civilization. Build it up, tear it down.
Nope this whole thing is designed to keep the boys occupied while the RICH boys continue their destruction; figure out a way to make us all pay for it; and leave. That they enlisted psychopaths in this endeavor is not the first time.
Once they can get rid of women altogether, maybe they’ll be happy for a little while anyway.
I maybe wrong and it’s jut the usual male fuckery but I bet it’s something close to what I’ve been thinking…but maybe it’s just more profit taking and male mess.
Either way, with humanity and the planet circling the drain I don’t think we’re gonna make it long term. Not a chance with boys like this in charge
dr kola kolawole, male psychiatrist had been convicted of second degree felony, forcible sexual abuse, and third degree felony forcible sodomy molestation of three juvenile patients at the ontario facility where he worked and sexual assault of a highschool girl in a park.
I don’t post them all, but here is a truly egregious one. This one disgusts me more than most. “Willow” defended Wolfgang Schmidt, a man so evil that he was known as the Beast of Beelitz. Wolfgang Schmidt, who from early childhood was sexually aroused by crossdressing and defecating on himself during the act, grew up to murder five women and a baby. Willow’s was so concerned about this monster’s preferred pronouns not being used that Willow entered into a lengthy rant about it. The reason I said that this is an issue of intelligence is because Willow claims this site provided “no sources” regarding the Beast’s childhood, despite that the links to the mainstream German news reports are provided in a giant glowing box under the article. Willow, who clearly has no experience beyond his narrow one in his white western nation, claims the word ‘transsexual’ is ‘outdated’, despite that ‘transsexual’ is the mainstream term in Brazil and Spanish-speaking nations for males who have undergone femininizing surgeries (the ones who have not had surgeries are called ‘transvestites’) and is often used in Indian and Pakistan. The term is often used in newspapers, by police and by members of this community. It is used in quotes, as no one is any more ‘transsexual’ than ‘transgender’ (all men are men).
Here we have “Rachel” upset over a story of a would-be serial killer who murdered farm employees in cold blood and fed their bodies to pigs. What upset Rachel is that the sex-based pronouns of the repeat killer were used. The rest of Rachel’s rant contained uninteresting insults, so much of it was cut off for the screenshot.
Hmm… So, using reality reflecting language somehow proves sexual repression?
That’s pretty rich coming from an adherent of an incredibly homophobic and misogynist polytheistic ritual castration and mutilation cult.
It’s tragic when you realize these gender identity believers are talking about themselves and their deepest fears and pain. Those who believe they have a ‘gender identity’ are so sexually repressed that they feel no particular attraction to other humans. In many cases, their sexual attractions are inverted, with each one being attracted to self only, getting sexually stimulated not by a partner or interactions with a partner but by what they wear on their own bodies and what pronouns they hear. A male treated in the severely degrading ways he believes women deserve is sexually arousing. They are really having ‘sex’ with themselves, and in the unlikely event a believer has a sex partner that person is a prop. Most believers sacrificed sex with other humans; they admit that few people of any sexual orientation are attracted to and willing to date or have sex with them, and cross-sex hormones or genital surgeries often destroys their genital function. This is ok with believers, because getting aroused by clothing and pronouns is more fulfilling. They dismiss sexual orientations as just transphobic bigotry and genital fetishes out of jealousy that other humans can desires, connections and satisfaction they can’t. They will never know healthy and fulfilling sexually intimate relationships. That’s a very sad fate I don’t share, and they’re projecting their complete misery and emptiness onto me and possibly others. I think they’re hope to hear more about my and others’ sex lives because they live vicariously through experiences they can’t have.
Eve is such a lovely person..
Mal-baisée is an insult for women, saying they’re “wrongly fucked”, so frustrated. As always, the women are responsible for men being too selfish to think about satisfying women when having sex with them.
And I love its argument about trans not harming women: “of course they don’t”, commenting an article about a trans harming women.
It’s all so tiresome.